There has already been enough talk about the comparison between the old-age cricket and modern era cricket. That too the ideology of cricket purists about the third and newly invented format and much hyped and much enjoyed T20 format is often under fire when it comes to the dwindling fan following for test cricket. Purists feel that the quality of the game is spoilt as the skills of the players are not fully tested in this shortest form of the game. I reckon the same kind of speculations may have clouded over the cricketing scenario when the 50-50 format was first implemented at the international level.
Cricket enthusiasts feel that yesteryear cricket and the players were much ahead in terms of skill and attitude towards the game and modern era cricket is much of a one side affair where only bowlers are clobbered around small parks which cannot even be called as playgrounds(take for instance Christchurch in NewZealand). This is quite visible from the fact that in early days, a score of around a 220 or 230 was a formidable total and was very much defendable but these days a 350, 380 or even a 434 is not a limit. This should be attributed to the quality of bats that are prepared these days and small boundary lines. In a comical sense, we can say that they both are inversely proportional to each other.
Though all such speculations exist about the modern era cricket, it cannot be denied that it has brought to the game a very big fan following off-late. The highlight is that people of all ages throng the stadium along with their families to watch the game which is a good sign for the development of the game. Though with the invent of the T20 format , test cricket is given its full due and importance and played with more intensity. It would be apt if we say that T20 format has brought in some aggression in the game that we find that almost all test matches played these days end as result producing ones unlike earlier days where we had many drawn test matches.
‘Change is permanent in everything and cricket is no exception’
Cricket enthusiasts feel that yesteryear cricket and the players were much ahead in terms of skill and attitude towards the game and modern era cricket is much of a one side affair where only bowlers are clobbered around small parks which cannot even be called as playgrounds(take for instance Christchurch in NewZealand). This is quite visible from the fact that in early days, a score of around a 220 or 230 was a formidable total and was very much defendable but these days a 350, 380 or even a 434 is not a limit. This should be attributed to the quality of bats that are prepared these days and small boundary lines. In a comical sense, we can say that they both are inversely proportional to each other.
Though all such speculations exist about the modern era cricket, it cannot be denied that it has brought to the game a very big fan following off-late. The highlight is that people of all ages throng the stadium along with their families to watch the game which is a good sign for the development of the game. Though with the invent of the T20 format , test cricket is given its full due and importance and played with more intensity. It would be apt if we say that T20 format has brought in some aggression in the game that we find that almost all test matches played these days end as result producing ones unlike earlier days where we had many drawn test matches.
‘Change is permanent in everything and cricket is no exception’